
Japan has been dominated by the Liberation Democratic Party (LDP) since 1955 and lost power in a brief period of time in 1993. Nevertheless, they had the majority rule and the power structure has been restored back to the LDP. Until at some point, for the first time in Japanese history, the Upper and Lower House has been divided by the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and by the LDP respectively. This is somewhat interesting because this has not happened before in Japanese politics history. To some it is somewhat frustating due to the fact that whenever the Lower House passes a policy, it gets denied or gets a veto by the Opposition. Thus there is a problem with a consensus between parties simply because they have different views. On the other hand, it proves to be normal and healthy since after Japan is now a democratic country. Now, people are trying to break the regime of the LDP because they want a fair run by the people and not by the bureaucrats. This is a Japan that Ichiro Ozawa hoped for Japan.
There are many aspects on why Japan is stuck on a vacuum which they cannot escape despite their efforts. Some claim that it is the policies and the system is the problem. But if you ask me, it is not the problem at all but the problem lies within the party itself specifically the LDP. There have been power struggles and pressures toward the Prime Minister whenever there are lowering of votes for him or whenever scandals and controversies arise around the issue. Another reason for Japan's downfall is that they are not use to experiencing these problems unlike other developed countries do so that is why Japan is making such a fuss over the issue. They are at a defecit, pension problems, high unemployment rate (atleast to them) are some problems to name a few. An old Japanese saying, "deru kugi ga utameru" or "a nail that sticks out, gets hammered down. I think this is one of the reasons why Japan hasn't reached a reform. It is typical Japanese to speak out their opinions in such matters. A lot of people are even confused to whether they choose to side the LDP or the DPJ. On one hand the LDP has been long established and made Japan to what it is now. On another would be something for a change which I hope for the better.
There are many efforts to try to change Japan. A man named Ichiro Ozawa made a difference by forming an Opposition that is competent enough to almost rival the LDP. Some others would be Shinzo Abe, Junichiro Koizumi & Aso Taro want to have a military back in Japan for defense, better relations in neighboring countries especially China. Not only that but strengthen ties with the USA as well. Change is actually good because I think that nothing is permanent. What may be good now might not be good tomorrow right? For instance as I've pointed out that the LDP's system and reign in governing Japan proved to be effective and good for a short period of time but in the long run, it has been the exact opposite in which it became a problem. There are many more prospects of reform in Japan but these men have stood out of the crowd and made drastic decisions for they believe that Japan would escape from the status quo from the LDP to become a just and freeer nation. It brings about the question: is it about time for Japan to reform? Would we see another Tokugawa Regime being replaced by the Meiji Restoration again? What do you think?
There are many aspects on why Japan is stuck on a vacuum which they cannot escape despite their efforts. Some claim that it is the policies and the system is the problem. But if you ask me, it is not the problem at all but the problem lies within the party itself specifically the LDP. There have been power struggles and pressures toward the Prime Minister whenever there are lowering of votes for him or whenever scandals and controversies arise around the issue. Another reason for Japan's downfall is that they are not use to experiencing these problems unlike other developed countries do so that is why Japan is making such a fuss over the issue. They are at a defecit, pension problems, high unemployment rate (atleast to them) are some problems to name a few. An old Japanese saying, "deru kugi ga utameru" or "a nail that sticks out, gets hammered down. I think this is one of the reasons why Japan hasn't reached a reform. It is typical Japanese to speak out their opinions in such matters. A lot of people are even confused to whether they choose to side the LDP or the DPJ. On one hand the LDP has been long established and made Japan to what it is now. On another would be something for a change which I hope for the better.
There are many efforts to try to change Japan. A man named Ichiro Ozawa made a difference by forming an Opposition that is competent enough to almost rival the LDP. Some others would be Shinzo Abe, Junichiro Koizumi & Aso Taro want to have a military back in Japan for defense, better relations in neighboring countries especially China. Not only that but strengthen ties with the USA as well. Change is actually good because I think that nothing is permanent. What may be good now might not be good tomorrow right? For instance as I've pointed out that the LDP's system and reign in governing Japan proved to be effective and good for a short period of time but in the long run, it has been the exact opposite in which it became a problem. There are many more prospects of reform in Japan but these men have stood out of the crowd and made drastic decisions for they believe that Japan would escape from the status quo from the LDP to become a just and freeer nation. It brings about the question: is it about time for Japan to reform? Would we see another Tokugawa Regime being replaced by the Meiji Restoration again? What do you think?